Tulsi Gabbard Under Fire for ‘Sackable Offense’: Reveals Undercover CIA Agent on Social Media

Tulsi Gabbard

Tulsi Gabbard

A Viral Political Implosion

It was supposed to be a typical takedown of security clearance —dialogue-heavy memo, click to post. Instead, it became a national scandal. Tulsi Gabbard, as Director of National Intelligence, released a memo on X naming 37 officials stripped of their security clearances, including a veteran undercover CIA officer. Cue explosive headlines, furious intelligence insiders, and an entirely different kind of “oops” moment. Gabbard’s office reportedly didn’t consult the CIA ahead of time—a misstep that had life-or-death implications for covert operations. She may have been acting on the President’s orders, but that didn’t cushion the fallout.The Daily BeastThe Washington Post

What Went Wrong—and Why It Matters

Here’s the play-by-play from the spotlight to the firestorm:

Political Firestorm and Legal Alarm Bells

Let’s be real: exposing an undercover agent isn’t a “whoopsie.” It’s potentially a Privacy Act violation, which isn’t just embarrassing—it is potentially felonious, depending on context and intent. This isn’t career-ending—it’s career-obliterating.The Daily Beast

Meanwhile, the political fallout is equally savage. Critics are demanding resignation or termination. As one expert tweeted, “‘Sackable.’ In any other administration, this would be a resigning or sackable offense.” Cue hard stare emoji.The Daily Beast

Gabbard’s Political Persona Under Microscope

This isn’t Gabbard’s first brush with controversy:

Now, with this name-revealing flub, those earlier red flags feel like cartoon foreshadowing.

Final Word: Intelligence Isn’t Reality TV (Even If It Sometimes Feels That Way)

In Hollywood terms, it’d be like a spy thriller gone sideways: the hero drops the villain’s identity mid-movie—and the next 24 hours implode. But this is real life, and the global stakes are higher.

Tulsi Gabbard may have aimed for political zeal—exposing alleged disloyalty—but ended up exposing a colleague’s hiding place—and possibly compromise. Intelligence professionals don’t usually call for resignations, but let’s just say this feels unscripted… and straight out of a cautionary tale.

All Sources

Exit mobile version